By swapping blog duty with Peter, I think I accidentally managed to avoid Azed 2000 which I suspect will be more than the run-of-the-mill challenge.
Across
1 | S(PUDDING)IN – initial drilling of a well. My last clue — though the wordplay’s easy. |
10 | FRENCH DOOR – don’t think Fords ever had sliding French doors but nonetheless a nice clue — comp. anag. (FRENCH DOOR, y)* = (Henry Ford, co)* |
11 | W,ROOT – archaic write |
13 | END(U)E – to dress, however is “originally” a kosher anagrind? |
14 | DANIEL – another comp. anag. — (DANIEL’s, no)* = (a lion’s den)* |
15 | P(R)EACE – Spenserian press = insist |
17 | EPA(ULE)T – ULE=rubber tree in rev(tape) |
18 | S,ODIUM |
19 | BIDS – “Bath Information and Data Services, an Internet service providing bibliographic information for academic users” which I’d never heard of — perhaps familiar to Brit academics? And I suppose BIDS can be the result of “inviting”. |
22 | T,AVA – a NZ fruit tree indeed and AVA=kava (which is what I had at first) which is a narcotic drink. |
24 | RE,A,SON – my first clue answered and rather easy for an Azed (thank goodness!) |
26 | S([i]T)ELENE – from stele thus “slab-like” with SELENE being a obselete term referring to the moon. |
29 | CO,RSAC* – an arctic fox |
30 | LI(LIE)D – LID for hat |
31 | E(MB)US – to get on a bus thus board. MB (one of the many Brit abbrevs for doctor) in rev(sue) |
32 | GONAD – hidden |
33 | NEURILEMMA – (male murine)* a neurological fibrous thingy (though you’d think it ought to be a small theorem proposed by a neuroscientist). |
34 | M(A,LAD)AP,TED – TED=teddy boy – 1950s era bad boys. |
Down
1 | SAW,DUST[up] – do they still have pubs with sawdust somewhere? | |
2 | P(A,RAZO[r])A – botanical sponges | |
3 | DROIT – (to, dri[nks])* | |
4 | D(ETEN)U[rance] – ETEN=giant in DU[rance] where rance=bar and DETENU is a prisoner (Indian?) | |
5 | INCLE(MEN)CY – MEN=chaps in (in, cycle)* | |
6 | G(HERA)O – I guess we know that HERA was really in charge. GHERAO is a siege of management to force them to… well, give you more money I suppose. | |
7 | NO(DALI)ISE – ref. Salvador DALI | |
8 | DO,UCE* – Scots “sober” | |
9 | GR,EET – rev(tee = the top of a dagoba = shrine). GR ref. one of the King Georges. | |
12 | AP(PARELLE)D – PARELLE=lichen in pad* | |
16 | AD VERB,UM – um… it’s literally the answer | |
20 | DOG,EATE[n] – the kind of office you’d aspire to if you were living in Venice say in the 16C | |
21 | SN(ODD)ED – Scots “smartened”- where SNED=cut | |
23 | DEASIL – sailed*. Scots for path of the sun | |
25 | ENIGMA – another comp. anag. (into, GERMAN)* = (torn, ENGIMA)*. It’s the code that Ultra broke to win the war. | |
26 | SCENE=”seen” | |
27 | TOMES – mesto=sad with its two syllables inverted | |
28 | C(LOM)P – LOM in rev(PC = copper). Presumably ref. the actor Herbert LOM (played a policeman in the Pink Panther series so not a bad clue). |
Thanks ilancaron.
Original can mean novel, so I think originally works as a anagrind.
I could see that the wordplay for 22ac could give TAVA, but there is no V in Maori so I rejected it without checking in Chambers. A careful reading of Chambers reveals that TAVA is a variant of TAWA in the sense of “a griddle used in Indian cookery” but not in the sense of “an evergreen tree … native to New Zealand”.
Matthew: I tend to agree with you – I think I noticed this at the time, but then forgot to be critical. You’re indeed right: TAWA = TAVA only the latter’s 2nd sense (the Indian griddle). So a mistake by Azed.
One of mine for one of yours. I failed to spot the comp. anag. at 14A, having it as 2 defs. At 19A BIDS = ‘is inviting’
Thanks for the blog, Ilancaron. My academic wife confirms that BIDS is indeed familiar to UK academics, not just those at the University of Bath.
I was a bit surprised to find that APPARELLED was an answer when APPAREL featured in the clue for 13 across. Also, does anyone else think that “old inscription” is a loose definition of “WROOT”, even though the wordplay made the answer very clear?
Bridgesong, I think the def. at 11A is ‘made part of old inscription’, the part being itself an inscription. The problem then is whether that is a transitive sense of ‘write’.
You WRITE when you make part of [an] inscription [today]
You WROOT when you made part of [an] inscription [when the obsolete ‘wroot’ was current]