I found this hard than average for Rufus, mainly because the structure of many of the clues (which is usually completely straightforward) is very well hidden in a smooth surface reading. I have some minor quibbles about a couple of definitions.
Across | ||||||||
7. | ONSLAUGHT | (THUS A LONG)* | ||||||
8. | UNRIG | RUIN* + G | ||||||
9. | REGISTRAR | Cryptic defintion referrin to the person who registers marriages | ||||||
10. | FIGHT | FLIGHT less L. According to my references a squadron consists of a number of FLIGHTs, so the definition is a bit inaccurate | ||||||
12. | STRIDE | ST[reet] + RIDE | ||||||
13. | ESPOUSAL | Double definition (though the two meanings are very closely related) | ||||||
14. | ABIGAIL | A BIG AIL. Abigail was one of King David’s eight wives in the OT. | ||||||
17. | HOLDALL | Cryptic defintion | ||||||
20. | ANTELOPE | ANTE (bet, e.g. in poker) + LOPE, &lit | ||||||
22. | RESIST | IS in REST | ||||||
24. | NIPPY | Double definition | ||||||
25. | CLEARANCE | Double definition – the “potter” is a snooker player wanting to clear the table | ||||||
26. | CHANT | CH[urch] + ANT | ||||||
27. | SEDENTARY | EDEN (garden) in ST + A RY | ||||||
Down | ||||||||
1. | INVERT | V (number) in INERT | ||||||
2. | FLAILING | L (another number!) in FAILING. I think of “flailing” as meaning thashing about ineffectively, but it can also mean to hit with a flail. | ||||||
3. | BUSTLE | SUBLET* | ||||||
4. | SHEARED | ARE in SHED. A very simple clue, as both parts of the wordplay are in plain view; fooled by the double bluff I tried and failed to make something involing a HUT. | ||||||
5. | IN SITU | (UNIT IS)* | ||||||
6. | HIGHBALL | HIGH (off, as in rotten food) + BALL (dance). | ||||||
11. | UP TO | Double definition, though I think “scheming” can only define “up to something” (on seconf thoughts, maybe “what are you up to?” = “what are you scheming?”) | ||||||
15. | BUNFIGHT | Cryptic definition, referring to a battle between Chelsea buns and Bath buns | ||||||
16. | IRON | (OR IN)* | ||||||
18. | DISTASTE | (TEST SAID)* | ||||||
19. | REPLIES | REP (salesman) LIES | ||||||
21. | EXPAND | EX-“panned” | ||||||
22. | REARED | ARE “in the RED” – a second use of ARE in a clue that appears directly in the answer | ||||||
23. | SECURE | CUR in SEE |
Thanks Andrew and Rufus
Enjoyable overall. Despite some very easy clues, I too found this slightly harder in parts than many of R’s puzzles – the grid does not help.
Smooth surfaces abound, as usual.
I ticked 17a, 25a, 27a, 15d, 16d for their lateral thinking.
Thanks Andrew.
Contrary to the two views so far, I found this quite easy, apart from the last four (24a, 13a, 11d, 21d). For a change, I actually liked a couple of the CDs, 17a and 15d.
Thanks Andrew and Rufus; good, enjoyable puzzle.
I forgot about the potter in snooker. π Like Dave @2, I enjoyed HOLDALL and BUNFIGHT. I thought the two meanings of ESPOUSAL were sufficiently different in usage.
I liked the misleading ‘turn up’ in INVERT, and, similarly, the ‘said’ in DISTASTE. I also appreciated the clue for BUSTLE.
Thanks Andrew. I wouldn’t say I found this hard, but I agree with you that the surfaces were nicely misleading. I also agree with Dave Ellison @ 2 about the CDs. I thought 15dn was great.
The other clue that particularly appealed to me was 3dn — great surface!
Minor quibble — I’m sure I will stand corrected, but is ‘ail’ the same as ‘pain’?
Liz @4; Chambers has ail=indisposition and the Xword dic has ail=pain, so I guess it’s OK. π
Thanks Robi!
I should have included 3d among my ‘ticks’. In addition to the surface, I like the word itself if only because it evokes fond old memories of a student friend strumming a ukelele and singing an amusing pseudo folk-song ‘I was a bustle-maker once, girls’. It seems this was written by an Irish aristocrat (Patrick Barrington, 1908-90) who was well known for his ‘humourous verse’.
Cf. http://www.poemhunter.com/poem/i-was-a-bustlemaker-once-girls/ for the words and for the man himself see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Barrington,_11th_Viscount_Barrington
Thanks Rufus and Andrew
Normal start to the week with reasonably straightforward offering from Rufus – finished in the SW corner with 14A the last in.
Did like the cleverly hidden short anagram at 16d. 17d brought a smile.
Surprised to see ARE used as an insert twice in the same grid.
Thank you Andrew for a comprehensive blog.
Regarding Squadron and Flight,Chambers gives the definitions SQUADRON “a unit under one command” and FLIGHT “a unit of the air force”, so I thought my use was reasonably fair.
During my 15 years in the RN in the Fleet Air Arm I served in several “flights” in Air Early Warning Skyraiders and Gannets, and ECM (Electronic Counter Measures) Avengers because 849 and 831 Squadrons were shore-based, but supplied several carriers with its aircraft. When embarked we were known as a Squadron, but became Flights when we were disembarked to our home base.
Agree strongly with most of the above. Fave clue 25, and we’re a lot better at snooker than we are at footer, let’s face it. And thanks to salty old seadog Rufus for a nice challenge.
I was intrigued by the ‘as sheep are in a shed’ clue, since the non-subsidiary part ‘as sheep’ does not adequately define SHEARED: perhaps sheep are WOOLLY, for example, before they are SHEARED. Reading the whole clue gives a better explanation, since sheep are quite often, one presumes, sheared in a shed, and so a semi-&lit kind of an aroma wafts over me. I’m brewing a pot of coffee right now, in fact, to try and reduce the pong.
I wondered about ‘a shed’ though. Just ‘shed’?
Thanks to Andrew for the blog. I needed you to explain why I had the right answer on a couple of occasions.
On 18d it took me a long time to spot that ‘complicated’ is being used as an anagrind π
Thanks all
Indeed wonderful misdirecting surfaces. Over 20 million of us were engrossed in a football match last night so the cunning compiler assumed it would take us into extra time to realise that 9ac was about marriages.
For non soccer fans there were equally misleading matches available: England v. West Indies at Nottingham, Chambers (?) v Gemili at Birmingham or even some obscure tennis matches.
Thanks, Andrew.
Enjoyed this one, with only CLEARANCE and INVERT holding me up at the end. Robi has already answered liz’s question, but I took it to be the equivalence between ‘What ails thee?’ and ‘What pains thee?’ A bit old-fashioned, but it worked for me. SHEARED? Hmmm. Thanks to Rufus for a good start to the week.
Thanks, Andrew.
I did enjoy “Victorian rear extension” for BUSTLE.
The consensus seem to easy in places but hard in places. I’ll go along with that.
It was a pity that “The only luggage one needs?” wasn’t (4,5) when one could reasonably get to “Your towel”. (Just to prove I do read books!)
First of all great blog, thank you! I’m only just discovering the joys and frustrations of crosswords so it’s helping me to learn no end. Pardon my ignorance but could somebody please elaborate on 3d? I got “bustle” from “sublet for redevelopment” recognising it was an anagram. But the penny didn’t drop how “Victorian rear extension” was “bustle.” If somebody should shed some light I’d be much olbliged! Thanks. Jack
Ahhhh sorry should’ve tried a trip to Google first. Silly me. Very clever!
Good puzzle. And thanks for that poem Tupu!
Thanks to johnmcc for alerting me to the poem and thanks to tupu for providing the link.
Music is my first love and not poetry but I loved this. I wonder if there’s a similar
poem about the demise of the crinoline although rhyming would be difficult.
Paul B @10 & KD @13: I share your misgivings about SHEARED.
Paul B @10 again: “Just shed?”
I have seen others object, usually tentatively, to redundancy in clues. I can only remember one response, which essentially said it was OK if it made for a better surface. So, for instance, if you want to hide NADIA it’s OK to add the redundant ‘Pacific Railway’ to ‘Canadian’.
Assuming that you think just ‘shed’ is better then, for what it’s worth, I agree. I will not say on what grounds, because I would probably need to refer to Ximenes, misunderstandings would arise and we would all stray far into General Discussion.
I wonder what RCW thinks. I don’t suppose he’ll tell us. He doesn’t do quibbles.
He likes ‘a bit of looseness on a Tuesday’ apparently, but this appeared on a Monday. If you do manage to contact him, let me know what he says.
Cannot be arsed,he loosely said.
RCWhiting: Loved your response! Impressed by a positive Mon blog too.