A change when adding comments – please read

[New comment layout] - details here

This site currently receives over 65,000 spam comments each month. The vast majority of these (>99.9%) are intercepted by the excellent Akismet spam filter and so never appear on posts but they are still an unwanted drain on server resources.

I have therefore introduced a Captcha that will need to be completed before a comment can be submitted. No, not one of those that uses impossible to read distorted letters (particularly on hand-held devices) or silly drag-and-drop games, just a simple arithmetic sum as shown on the screenshot below. I felt that this was a better option than requiring you to register at the site and then having to log in before being able to add a comment.

Until you get used to the change, I strongly recommend that before you click on the ‘Submit Comment’ button you right-click and pick ‘Select All’ (or use Ctrl+A) followed by right-click ‘Copy’ (or Ctrl+C). Then, if you forget to fill in the Captcha, you can paste your comment back into the empty text box (right-click ‘Paste’ or Ctrl+V). If you forget to fill in the Captcha, after clicking on the ‘Submit Comment’ button you will receive an error message and you will then need to use your browser’s ‘Back’ button to return to the post.

 

18 comments on “A change when adding comments – please read”

  1. Paul B
    @1
    November 24, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    Testing!

  2. Gaufrid
    @2
    November 24, 2012 at 5:14 pm

    Thanks Paul B. You drew my attention to the fact that I hadn’t modified the ‘Preview’ plug-in so that the site matched the screenshot I generated earlier.

  3. @3
    November 24, 2012 at 7:43 pm

    It would be less missable just above the Submit Comment button, especially if one doesn’t scroll down far enough to see it.

    Presumably you will change the sum with some frequency?

  4. @4
    November 24, 2012 at 7:46 pm

    OOO look! It HAS changed! Belay previous question!

  5. Gaufrid
    @5
    November 24, 2012 at 8:30 pm

    Hi Derek
    “It would be less missable just above the Submit Comment button, especially if one doesn’t scroll down far enough to see it.”

    I agree. In some WordPress themes it appears above the text box but with the one we are using, which I don’t want to change as I rather like it, it comes at the end. I could possibly change this if I edit the relevant theme file but at this stage I would prefer to concentrate my efforts on other methods of reducing cpu usage.

  6. Rishi
    @6
    November 26, 2012 at 1:07 am

    No problem, Gaufrid.

    The arithmetical captcha that you use is different from the one that I have seen elsewhere. Here one of the numbers is in words (or should I say ‘is a word’).

    But it is quite easy and so I can cope.

    Now let me prove that I am a human.

  7. Gervase
    @7
    November 26, 2012 at 10:16 am

    Blimey!

  8. Gaufrid
    @8
    November 26, 2012 at 6:16 pm

    Derek @3
    Further to my previous reply, I have added a reminder to scroll down above the text box.

  9. bagbird
    @9
    November 27, 2012 at 9:39 am

    A well thought out and sensible solution.

  10. nametab
    @10
    November 27, 2012 at 7:37 pm

    simply testing

  11. cholecyst
    @11
    November 28, 2012 at 10:17 am

    …me too.

  12. Ally
    @12
    November 28, 2012 at 10:27 am

    The spammers really ruin everything don’t they! I am glad you went for the sum kind of CAPTCHA, I can just about cope with those. My eyes aren’t what they used to be so I had to download some CAPTCHA bypass software called RUMOLA to read the regular kind! They just look like a rather lumpy motion blur or something half the time and make me feel ancient. Thankfully arithmetic doesn’t have this effect.
    Ally

  13. @13
    November 28, 2012 at 10:30 am

    If the Captcha device reduces spam, it should prove much more effective than losing so many posts from the first page. After all, the page content is only text, so the difference between displaying 10 posts and 50 should be unnoticeable.

    On one or two occasions over past couple of days the site has been very slow to load or has failed to establish database connection (on other occasions it’s been very quick). With Captcha and reduced page content in place, it looks like the webhost is still providing a, ahem, ‘less than perfect’ service.

  14. muck
    @14
    November 28, 2012 at 8:32 pm

    If the catchpa ia part alphabetic and part numeral, eg two + 8, can the answer be either alphabetic ie ten or numeric ie 10 ?

  15. muck
    @15
    November 28, 2012 at 8:34 pm

    It appears that the answer has to be numeric

  16. Gaufrid
    @16
    November 28, 2012 at 9:12 pm

    Hi Anax @13
    I would agree with you which is why I am actively looking into a change of hosting company.

    Hi muck @14
    The solution box will only acceprt a maximum of two characters so it has to be numeric, as you have determined. Part of the Captcha is alphabetic in an attempt to fool the spambots. From the stats for the past couple of days this is not entirely successful. However I am loath to change to a traditional, often unreadable, Captcha nor the alternative of a childish drag-and-drop game.

  17. @17
    November 28, 2012 at 9:54 pm

    Gaufrid, have a look at the Captcha on my Messages page on my web site. It is wiggly characters but not unreadable. My message board is provided from smartgb.com, maybe if you mail them they would tell you where they got from, or if it is their own, whether they make it seperately available.

    However, just looking at the HTML/Javascript for that page, I could be wrong, but it looks like all the code is present on that page. Might be worth a look. I can sort of do HTML/Javascipt coding, but I prefer to leave it to others as it’s not my area of programming expertise.

  18. muck
    @18
    November 28, 2012 at 11:52 pm

    Gaufrid@16
    The spambots are too *deleted by me* clever
    But please stick with the present Captcha unless things get worse

Comments are closed.