Everyman has definitely settled into a consistent style now.
Month: June 2019
AZED 2,454
As straightforward as an Azed could ever be…
Guardian Genius 192 by Paul
What a disappointment!
Independent on Sunday 1,531 by Peter
Mostly a pleasant and gentle Sunday puzzle but with the odd tricky word thrown in here and there to stop me getting complacent. Thank you Peter.
Independent 10206 by Nimrod
Oh joy – Nimrod. Usually comes in two difficulty levels hard and very hard. But not today or my wavelength just met his for a change. I did find this comparatively easy for … Read more >>
Guardian Prize 27,854 by Paul
Great puzzle. I really enjoy getting Paul to solve and blog. His puzzles are always entertaining and have the extra dimension that I’m never quite sure what to expect. The clues might be serious or flippant, hard or easy, traditional or outrageously libertarian. Thanks for them all.
Enigmatic Variations No. 1387: Wonderful Ghoul by Kcit
I thought this was a ‘blinking’ hard puzzle from Kcit (aka Phi)…educational and challenging…just how I like ’em… The preamble states that: “Wordplay in eleven clues varies from the entered answer by one … Read more >>
Independent 10205 / Phi
Phi provides a challenge with a theme today The main theme of PACIFIC ISLANDs becomes clear once 8 and 9 across have been solved. I knew all of them except … Read more >>
Financial Times 16,205 by WANDERER
Another delightful offering from WANDERER, this Friday. A couple of new meanings I learnt along the way towards a generally speedy solve.
Guardian Cryptic 27,859 by Nutmeg
The puzzle may be found at https://www.theguardian.com/crosswords/cryptic/27859.
Guardian 27,858 / Paul
Paul makes his customary weekly appearance on Thursday, since he filled the Prize slot last Saturday. It’s a fairly typical mixed bag, with some straightforward clues to help get us started, together with … Read more >>
Independent 10,204 by Dalibor
Dalibor is a fairly recent setter for the Indy and he is clearly worth his place there: this crossword, like its predecessors, contains some very good clues with nice misleading surfaces. And, apart from the next comment and a few very minor quibbles, they are all so far as I can see sound and good.
There are four clues which grate on me because they have <50% checking. I don’t know why this is such a bugbear — I always comment on it — since when you’re solving a clue early on you may have only one of the many letters there to help you, so why 2 out of 5 is such a problem I’m not sure: presumably it’s because Ximenes gave it as a “rule” in his famous book. At any rate no Times crossword (for many people the gold standard, whatever their views on Murdoch) ever has <50% checking.
Definitions underlined, in maroon. Anagram indicators in italics.
Financial Times 16,204 by CHALMIE
A healthy dose of fun from Chalmie this morning…
Financial Times 16,194 by Mudd
Prize puzzle from the Weekend FT of June 15, 2019
Financial Times 16,203 by MONK
Super stuff – the solutions solutions seem obvious, but only appear so after a lot of hard work. Thanks Monk