Some Monday morning fun with ZAMORCA…
Some nice clues here, with a lack of straight double definitions, and some great surfaces. Some of the parsing was a bit fiddly, but enjoyable nonetheless.
Thanks ZAMORCA!
(I believe that this is Teacow’s 100th FT blog)
CON (tory) + TEMPT (lure)
THAT (which) associated with CH (church)
RE (soldiers) + V (against) + O (ordinary) + LT (officer)
(ROPEWAY)* (*used) to carry N (nationalist)
[howe]VER B[eing] (locked in)
As in “This sentence no verb.”
PART (section) + (CU (copper) taken in by (LIAR)* (*crafty))
DOZE[n] (12, mostly) before DO (party) gets FF (very loud)
DR (doctor) + (PI)< (letter from Greece, <returned)
IN (home) + FO[r] (contract)
(LEARNT TO)* (*fake)
(I (island) + MEN (soldiers)) engaged in EXPERT (specialist)
RE (about), (I (one) + [nave]L (last)) piercing
TO A + STING (former member of the Police)
[quali]FIER CE[lebrated] (inclusion)
P (quiet) (AS + IRE (anger)) over
Double cryptic definition
(BO)< (bad smell, <rampant) + (SEE)* (*mouldy)
ROUBLE (foreign currency) hidden in TOME (volume)
MET (satisfied) + A + “four” (number, “picked up”)
having TO cover (around) OWER (debtor) + F (fine) + STRENGTH (might)
(CART)< (wagon, <coming back) carrying GI (soldier)
A + DO (cheat)
(IN A CARTON)* (*could be)
(DER (the,German) + (RA)< (artist, <revolutionary)) adopted by UNREST (rebellion)
O (old) + BUS (coach) receiving (NO + XI (team) + O (love))
SLOTH (animal) + FUL[l] (had enough to eat, almost)
DIVE (joint) round ID (I would)
L (line) + (CO)< (company, <backing) + U[nion] M[an] (initially)
SKI[p] (miss, nearly)
I remember your first blog, Teacow. Has it really been that long? Congrats.
Had a quick look at previous offerings by Zamorca and I think this is the best of the bunch. Admittedly, a fairly small bunch. Nothing too tricky but a few unusual anagram indicators slowed me up. I thought the inclusion at 11a was particularly clever.
Thanks to Zamorca and Teacow.
Yes, a pleasant amble that had some robust stopping-points. I’m going to use it to show a cryptic novice how things work. Thanks, Teacow and Zamorca.
Thanks to Zamorca and Teacow. Very enjoyable. I needed the crossers to get several of the short items and also (for some reason) ASPIRE
Thanks Zamorca for a well crafted crossword. Didn’t realize that DO could mean “cheat” (7d) as well as “party” (14a). It seems that tiny word can cover a lot of ground. Took forever to get 2d as I did not see “rampant” as a reversal indicator for BO. One of my favorites was my LOI, 20d. Thanks Teacow for the blog.
This was another well-written crossword from a setter who we also know as Hectence.
Same style, same consistency.
However, unlike Hornbeam, I wouldn’t use this particular puzzle to show a novice what’s it all about.
In my opinion, there were a handful of things novices should stay away from.
Like the indicator ‘contract’ in 18ac (perhaps, meant to be an imperative?).
Or the nounal indicator ‘inclusion’ in 26ac – ‘fodder inclusion’ just doesn’t work for me.
Neither does the construction in 27ac which is formulated rather clumsily (though others may be fine with it).
And then there is ‘last navel’ = L – not in my book of crosswords but, yes, that is only a (and not the) book.
While all this is perhaps just a matter of taste, I think the definition in 23d is simply not right.
Zamorca gives us ‘stand in’ (which suits the surface) but a LOCUM is really a ‘stand-in’.
For me, proof that punctuation sometimes does matter.
Anyway.
Many thanks to Teacow & Zamorca.
Thanks Teacow and Zamorca for a pleasant solving experience.
Thanks Zamorca and Teacow (congrats on reaching the 100)
A fairly quick but enjoyable solve with enough little tricks to keep things interesting all the way to the finish. There looks to be an S missing from ROUBLES in 3d.
Didn’t have as much grief as Sil with the aspects mentioned, although ‘stand in’ without the hyphen did make me look twice.
Finished with SLOTHFUL and INFO as the last couple in.