I took a look at the list of last year’s Top 20 Inquisitor puzzles in terms of aggregate points awarded to the setters: eXternal and Ifor were almost inseparable at the top, with eXternal edging it by just a quarter of a point. Well done to both.
Preamble: In 36 clues (12 sets of three), a trio of consecutive letters must be removed before solving; middle letters of each trio in each set should be joined to make six trios each from across and down clues. Trios from across clues can be sequenced to make an author and those from down clues to make a title; solvers must replace six trios spelling out the names of the titular characters in the initially-filled grid with six trios of a thematic quotation (in ODQ). The final grid contains all real words and phrases.
Three of this, three of that, three of something else to be replaced by a final set of three – lots of threes, which I hope will settle down as I make progress through the puzzle. Some of the trios to be removed stood out starkly, for example “s[cal]loping” and “wa[ssa]iled” in the first two across clues, but others were rather deftly disguised. I think I solved about a third of the clues first time through, about the same number of acrosses and downs, and the top left & bottom right quadrants were shaping up quite nicely, but those on the top right & bottom left looked decidedly sparse.
I had already noticed that the removals left real words in the clues, but it was only when I came back to the puzzle the next day that I realised that the setter had been even nicer to us – each set of removals came from three consecutive clues and each of the sets was separated from the next set by a single ordinary clue. (Was this obvious from the rubric?) Things sped up after I’d realised that, and it was time to make a serious attack on the NE quadrant; 6d, 8d, 9d fell in rapid succession, the middle letters from that set of removals read USK, and that was my “aha!” moment. Blogger’s stress quickly dissipated. The idea that had been lurking subliminally almost since the start of the puzzle sprang to the fore: that had to be THE THREE MUSKETEERS by ALEXANDRE DUMAS, and after a quick check I appended PÈRE to the author to make up the numbers. From there it was a relatively easy task to polish off the rest of the clues. (I stress relatively.)
I put the puzzle away for the day and came back fresh the following afternoon to hunt for ATHOS, PORTHOS, and ARAMIS. (For some reason I’d picked up on several occurrences of OS in the grid as I’d been going along.) I scanned the grid for M and soon found MIS, then ARA up & to the left, followed by ATH and the rest down & to the right, all in what resembled an open staircase descending the leading diagonal. From there it was a swift move to replace the staircase with their motto ALL FOR ONE, ONE FOR ALL and we’re done. Very elegant.
Thanks eXternal – most enjoyable, and another brilliant grid construction.
PS We saw the “90% discount” device (used here in the clue for 38d) quite recently, but I can’t remember which puzzle nor the setter. Anyone?
I’m here to check out the parsings for the title
I wasnt familiar with Père being added to the author but parsing and anagrinders got me there, what with trios and letter count it HAD to be that title
I’m a great fan of Dumas and I could see the characters swashbuckling their way through the grid and it seemed like the easy bit to stick the motto in
Splendid puzzle(awful fillum)
Thanks HG and eX
I loved the way the ‘trios’ theme ran through this, covering the title of the work, the name of the author and the names of the characters – as well as the way that the clues were distributed, with normal clues separating trios of clues, as noted by the blogger (although it took me a long time, relatively, to discover that).
It was a pleasure working through all the clues, some of them (where the trio was hard to pin down) being quite tough. When the grid was complete, and I was certain of having identified all but two of the 36 trios (and picked out their middle letters), I recognised both the writer and the work pretty much simultaneously. With this theme, incidentally, I didn’t have to look anything up.
Thanks to eXternal and HolyGhost.
Just seen the parsing of the down clues-this was a case of “no cigar”although I got the theme
Must try harder!
Superb puzzle
All very cleverly done I thought. I particularly liked the way that the theme of TRIO ran all of the way through the puzzle, from start to finish. A really excellent puzzle which was a pleasure to (successfully) complete – with all clues solved and parsed correctly here.
You had me scratching my head over “three consecutive cells” until I realised that you probably meant “three consecutive clues”.
How great to notice that Dumas has the same number of letters as his most famous novel. That his three protagonists the same number of letters as their slogan. No search engine required. Others have rightly praised the elegance of construction and unity of theme; I loved the helpfulness of the setter in the patterning of both the slogan in the grid and ‘defective’ clues. Likely one of the picks of the year.
What an absolutely wonderful puzzle, a definite contender for Inquisitor of the Year for me if nothing else than for its sheer elegance.
Scarcely believable that title, author, main characters and slogan all have 18 letters!
TonyG @6: now corrected – well spotted, thanks.
O is joy unbounded! (…and it is!!)
My first completion for several months. Unusually I worked out the theme after only having solved about five clues, and actually completely independently of those five — the Three Muskeeters are a famous trio, and once I spotted the 18-lettered-ness of title, author (thank you, Wiki) and protagonists, I was away.
I got confused by the “sets of trios” and had to reread the rubric a number of times. But I eventually understood at just the right moment to unlock a few more clues.
Thanks to eXternal — an early contender for puzzle of the year for me too, (a) for the elegance of three sets of 18 letters, and (b) for the satisfaction of completion. Given the trials of a taxing day job it’s a very welcome diversion each evening.
And thanks to HolyGhost for the blog too.
It’s all been said. A brilliant puzzle with a gob-smacking grid construction. The only bit that floored me was the parsing of 38D. As a teenager, I saw bits of the tale on TV and so knew enough not to need any research for the endgame. But the OTT swashbuckling put me off the book. I did, however, read The Count of Monte Cristo and The Black Tulip, and I enjoyed both.
Thanks to External for an entertaining ride and to HG for the thorough analysis.
Not bad at this setting lark, is he?
Such a satisfying puzzle to solve. Everything so neat and beautifully crafted.
Thanks eXternal and HolyGhost.
I wanted to add that the thing that elevates eXternal’s puzzles, both alone and with Serpent, is that not only is the grid construction a thing of wonder but that they never forget that we are all solvers and as such like good clueing, an abundance of which are always on show in both setters’ work.
Apologies for the quite dreadful grammar in my last post. Long day.
Nothing to add to the above really, except to say that this was thoroughly enjoyed!
Lots to admire in this beautiful puzzle. Chapeau, eXternal!
Coming late to the party here, but I really should add my tuppence-worth of enthusiasm for the neatness of the whole thing. All thanks to eXternal and HolyGhost.
I didn’t try to look at the generated letter trios until I’d filled the grid, and it was a nice surprise to find how easily they rearranged to author and title — I’d been half expecting some grim anagrammatic struggle. And it’s always cheering to complete the endgame without needing to check the book or fiddle with Google. Great stuff.
DL:18 Hear hear to your second paragraph!