Guardian 25,461 / Rufus

A pleasant Rufus puzzle to start the week, with the expected succinctly elegant surfaces and touches of wry humour, with a liberal sprinkling of double definitions. There are a couple of old favourite … Read more >>

Guardian 25,447 / Araucaria

An entertaining and enjoyable workout from Araucaria, with not too many liberties taken, I think. A few weeks ago, I blogged an Enigmatist puzzle based on London Underground stations, some of which I’d … Read more >>

Guardian 25,437 / Rufus

It’s Monday, it’s Rufus and I’m saying no more today, except,’Thank you, Rufus’! Across 7   SOFT PEDAL: cryptic definition Edit: I completely missed the anagram [‘regulating’] of ADOPT SELF [thanks, Neil and Geoff] … Read more >>

Guardian 25,433 / Gordius

My second blog of a Gordius puzzle in less than two weeks – and it’s another rather mixed bag … Across 1   REPEATING: REP [agent] EATING [having lunch] 6   EACH: contained in tEACHing … Read more >>

Guardian 25,428 / Orlando

An Orlando puzzle with the usual good variety of clues and some brilliantly misleading surfaces, with a number of smiles to boot. ‘Wit’ and ‘elegance’ are the epithets that most naturally spring to … Read more >>

Guardian 25,423 / Gordius

A fairly typical Gordian mixed bag, I think – some clever clues, together with some very loose definitions and one glaring inaccuracy. Older solvers may have found this puzzle rather easier. 😉 Across … Read more >>

Guardian 25,413 / Orlando

After Araucaria’s Bank Holiday double challenge, a very pleasant diversion from Orlando for the holiday itself. I didn’t find this too taxing but there’s much to admire here: the usual wit, elegance and … Read more >>

Independent 7,751 / Phi

My first blog of an Indy puzzle – as a one-off substitute for flashling, who’s been away setting off spectacular fireworks. I know to expect a Nina or theme from Phi and the … Read more >>

Guardian 25,404 / Boatman

It’s five months since I blogged a Boatman puzzle and I commented then that we don’t see him often enough. There have been only two in between, so that’s certainly true! We know … Read more >>